This quiz works best with JavaScript enabled.
Home
>
Unit Vi Logical Reasoning
>
Types Of Analogies – Quiz 7
Types Of Analogies Quiz 7 (10 MCQs)
This set of multiple-choice questions evaluates analogical reasoning, categorization, and relationship identification. It covers various analogy types, including part-to-whole, creator-work, function, and location-based relationships. The material tests understanding of word relationships, action-purpose pairs, and logical reasoning skills.
Quiz Instructions
Select an option to see the correct answer instantly.
1.
Acknowledge is to ignore as travel is to remain.This analogy uses .....
A) Antonyms.
B) Synonyms.
Show Answer
Correct Answer:
Correct answer is: (A) Antonyms.
Exam Relevance:
GRE, SAT, LSAT, GMAT
Difficulty:
Easy
Concept notes:
Analogies often involve relationships between pairs of words. In this case, the relationship is based on antonyms, where the words in each pair have opposite meanings.
Common Mistakes:
A common mistake is to confuse antonyms with synonyms, which have similar meanings rather than opposite meanings.
Explanations:
In the analogy "Acknowledge is to ignore as travel is to remain," the words "acknowledge" and "ignore" are antonyms, as are "travel" and "remain." Both pairs of words have opposite meanings, making the relationship between them antonymic.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. The relationship between the words in each pair is based on antonyms.
Option B:
Incorrect. The words in each pair do not have similar meanings, so they are not synonyms.
2.
What type of word relationship is this:Alligator is to reptile as bracelet is to jewelry.
A) Part/Whole.
B) Cause/Effect.
C) Member/Category.
D) None of above.
Show Answer
Correct Answer:
Correct answer is: (C) Member/Category.
Exam Relevance:
GRE, GMAT, LSAT, SAT
Difficulty:
Moderate
Concept notes:
Analogies can be categorized based on the relationship between the terms. One common type is the Member/Category relationship, where one term is a specific member of a broader category.
Common Mistakes:
A common mistake is confusing the Member/Category relationship with Part/Whole, where one term is a part of the other. In this case, an alligator is a type of reptile, not a part of it.
Explanations:
The relationship between "alligator" and "reptile" is that of a specific member to a broader category. Similarly, "bracelet" is a specific type of jewelry. Both pairs demonstrate a Member/Category relationship.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Part/Whole is incorrect because an alligator is not a part of a reptile, and a bracelet is not a part of jewelry.
Option B:
Cause/Effect is incorrect because there is no causal relationship between an alligator and a reptile, or between a bracelet and jewelry.
Option C:
Member/Category is correct because an alligator is a member of the category reptile, and a bracelet is a member of the category jewelry.
Option D:
None of the above is incorrect because the correct relationship is clearly defined as Member/Category.
3.
Which analogy shows a relationship of an object to its function?
A) Key: Unlock.
B) Night: Day.
C) Puppy: Dog.
D) Finger: Hand.
Show Answer
Correct Answer:
Correct answer is: (A) Key: Unlock.
Exam Relevance:
GRE, SAT, GMAT, LSAT
Difficulty:
Easy
Concept notes:
An analogy that shows a relationship of an object to its function demonstrates how a specific object is used or what it does.
Common Mistakes:
A common mistake is to confuse the relationship between objects with other types of relationships, such as part-whole or category relationships.
Explanations:
The correct answer is "Key: Unlock" because a key is an object that is used to unlock something. This shows a clear relationship between the object (key) and its function (unlocking).
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Key: Unlock. This is the correct answer as it shows the relationship between an object and its function.
Option B:
Night: Day. This is incorrect because it shows a relationship between two contrasting concepts, not an object and its function.
Option C:
Puppy: Dog. This is incorrect because it shows a relationship between a specific instance and a general category, not an object and its function.
Option D:
Finger: Hand. This is incorrect because it shows a part-whole relationship, not an object and its function.
4.
Analyze the word pair to identify the relationship. What is the relationship in the analogy 'author: book:: composer: song'?
A) Part to Whole.
B) Creator to Creation.
C) Object to Function.
D) Antonym.
Show Answer
Correct Answer:
Correct answer is: (Choice B) Creator to Creation.
Exam Relevance:
GRE, SAT, GMAT, LSAT
Difficulty:
Easy
Concept notes:
Analogies often involve relationships between pairs of words. In this case, the relationship is between a creator and their creation.
Common Mistakes:
A common mistake might be to confuse the relationship with "Part to Whole" or "Object to Function," which do not accurately describe the relationship between an author and a book, or a composer and a song.
Explanations:
The relationship in the analogy 'author: book:: composer: song' is "Creator to Creation." An author creates a book, and a composer creates a song. Both pairs involve a person who produces a specific work.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
This option suggests a part-whole relationship, which is incorrect because an author and a book, and a composer and a song, are not parts of each other.
Option B:
This option correctly identifies the relationship as "Creator to Creation," which accurately describes the roles of an author and a composer in relation to their respective works.
Option C:
This option suggests an object-function relationship, which is incorrect because the relationship between an author and a book, and a composer and a song, is not about function but about creation.
Option D:
This option suggests an antonym relationship, which is incorrect because an author and a book, and a composer and a song, are not opposites.
5.
Identify the type of analogy: Car is to Garage as Plane is to Hangar.
A) Synonym.
B) Antonym.
C) Part to Whole.
D) Object and Place.
Show Answer
Correct Answer:
Correct answer is: (D) Object and Place.
Exam Relevance:
GRE, SAT, LSAT, GMAT
Difficulty:
Moderate
Concept notes:
Analogies can be categorized into different types based on the relationship between the paired items. One such type is "Object and Place," where the first item is an object and the second item is a place where the object is typically found or stored.
Common Mistakes:
A common mistake is confusing "Object and Place" with "Synonym" or "Antonym," which involve relationships of meaning rather than location.
Explanations:
In the analogy "Car is to Garage as Plane is to Hangar," the relationship is that of an object (car or plane) and the place where it is typically stored or kept (garage or hangar). This fits the "Object and Place" type of analogy.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Synonym - This is incorrect because the terms "car" and "garage" or "plane" and "hangar" are not synonyms; they do not have the same or similar meanings.
Option B:
Antonym - This is incorrect because the terms "car" and "garage" or "plane" and "hangar" are not opposites; they do not have contrasting meanings.
Option C:
Part to Whole - This is incorrect because "car" and "garage" or "plane" and "hangar" do not represent a part-whole relationship; a garage is not a part of a car, and a hangar is not a part of a plane.
Option D:
Object and Place - This is correct because "car" and "garage" or "plane" and "hangar" represent an object and the place where it is typically stored or kept.
6.
Identify the type of analogy used. Choose "synonym, antonym, part and whole, characteristic, function, or cause and effect." 1. heat: cook
A) Antonym.
B) Synonym.
C) Characteristic.
D) Part and whole.
E) Function.
Show Answer
Correct Answer:
Correct answer is: (E) Function.
Exam Relevance:
GRE, GMAT, LSAT, SAT
Difficulty:
Moderate
Concept notes:
Analogies based on function relate two pairs of words where one word in each pair performs a specific action or serves a specific purpose.
Common Mistakes:
A common mistake is to confuse function analogies with cause and effect analogies. In function analogies, the relationship is about the action or purpose, not the result of an action.
Explanations:
The relationship between "heat" and "cook" is based on function. Heat is used to cook food. The function of heat in this context is to cook. Therefore, the analogy "heat: cook" is a function analogy.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Antonym - This is incorrect because "heat" and "cook" are not opposites.
Option B:
Synonym - This is incorrect because "heat" and "cook" are not synonyms.
Option C:
Characteristic - This is incorrect because "heat" is not a characteristic of "cook."
Option D:
Part and whole - This is incorrect because "heat" is not a part of "cook."
Option E:
Function - This is correct because "heat" serves the function of cooking.
7.
Identify the relationship in the following analogy: finger is to hand as petal is to flower.
A) Part to whole.
B) Object to function.
C) Cause to effect.
D) Antonyms.
Show Answer
Correct Answer:
Correct answer is: (A) Part to whole.
Exam Relevance:
GRE, SAT, GMAT, LSAT
Difficulty:
Easy
Concept notes:
Analogies can be categorized based on the relationship between the terms. One common type is the "part to whole" relationship, where one term is a part of the other.
Common Mistakes:
A common mistake is to confuse "part to whole" with other types of analogies, such as "object to function" or "cause to effect."
Explanations:
In the analogy "finger is to hand as petal is to flower," the relationship is "part to whole." A finger is a part of a hand, and a petal is a part of a flower. This relationship is consistent with the "part to whole" type of analogy.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. The relationship is "part to whole." A finger is a part of a hand, and a petal is a part of a flower.
Option B:
Incorrect. "Object to function" would imply that a finger performs a function for a hand, which is not the case here.
Option C:
Incorrect. "Cause to effect" would imply that a finger causes something to happen to a hand, which is not the case here.
Option D:
Incorrect. "Antonyms" would imply that a finger and a hand are opposites, which is not the case here.
8.
What type of analogy is the following-Teacher: School:: Doctor: Hospital
A) Location.
B) Function.
C) Performer and Related Action.
D) Synonym.
Show Answer
Correct Answer:
Correct answer is: (A) Location.
Exam Relevance:
GRE, SAT, GMAT, LSAT
Difficulty:
Easy
Concept notes:
Analogies can be categorized based on the relationship between the pairs. In this case, the relationship is based on location.
Common Mistakes:
A common mistake is to confuse the relationship with function, where one might think the analogy is based on the roles or duties of the individuals.
Explanations:
The analogy "Teacher: School:: Doctor: Hospital" is based on the location where the individuals typically perform their roles. A teacher works at a school, and a doctor works at a hospital. This relationship is clearly one of location.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. The analogy is based on the location where the individuals work.
Option B:
Incorrect. The analogy is not based on the function or role of the individuals.
Option C:
Incorrect. The analogy does not describe a performer and a related action.
Option D:
Incorrect. The analogy does not involve synonyms.
9.
What is the definition for "part to whole" in terms of analogy type?
A) Words that have the opposite meaning.
B) Description of a noun.
C) One word is the source of some action, the other word is the result or consequence.
D) The first word is part of a second word as a whole.
Show Answer
Correct Answer:
Correct answer is: (D) The first word is part of a second word as a whole.
Exam Relevance:
GRE, SAT, LSAT, GMAT
Difficulty:
Moderate
Concept notes:
In analogy types, "part to whole" refers to a relationship where one term is a component or part of the other term, which represents the whole.
Common Mistakes:
A common misunderstanding is confusing "part to whole" with other analogy types, such as "antonyms" or "cause and effect."
Explanations:
The "part to whole" analogy type describes a relationship where the first word is a component or part of the second word, which represents the whole. For example, "wheel to car" or "finger to hand." This type of analogy focuses on the hierarchical relationship between a part and the whole it belongs to.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
This describes antonyms, which are words with opposite meanings, not part-to-whole relationships.
Option B:
This describes a descriptive relationship, which is not the same as a part-to-whole relationship.
Option C:
This describes a cause-and-effect relationship, where one word is the source of some action and the other is the result, not a part-to-whole relationship.
Option D:
This correctly describes the "part to whole" analogy type, where the first word is a part of the second word as a whole.
10.
What is the relationship in the analogy 'page: book'?
A) Part to whole.
B) Whole to part.
C) Synonym.
D) Antonym.
Show Answer
Correct Answer:
Correct answer is: (A) Part to whole.
Exam Relevance:
GRE, GMAT, LSAT, SAT
Difficulty:
Easy
Concept notes:
Analogies can be categorized based on the relationship between the terms. One common type is the part-to-whole relationship, where one term is a component or part of the other term.
Common Mistakes:
A common mistake is confusing part-to-whole relationships with whole-to-part relationships. In this case, a page is a part of a book, not the other way around.
Explanations:
In the analogy 'page: book', a page is a component or part of a book. This relationship is a part-to-whole relationship, where the first term (page) is a part of the second term (book). Therefore, the correct answer is 'Part to whole'.
Option Analysis:
Option A:
Correct. A page is a part of a book, which is a part-to-whole relationship.
Option B:
Incorrect. A book is not a part of a page; it is the whole that contains the page.
Option C:
Incorrect. 'Page' and 'book' are not synonyms; they have a part-to-whole relationship.
Option D:
Incorrect. 'Page' and 'book' are not antonyms; they have a part-to-whole relationship.
← Previous
Next →
Related Quizzes
Frequently Asked Questions
What are analogies?
Analogies are comparisons that highlight similarities between two different things, often used to explain or clarify complex ideas by relating them to more familiar concepts.
What types of relationships are covered in analogies?
Analogies can cover various types of relationships, including hierarchical, part-to-whole, function, and location-based relationships, among others.
How can understanding analogies improve logical reasoning?
Understanding analogies enhances logical reasoning by improving the ability to identify patterns, make connections, and draw inferences between different concepts or situations.
What is a part-to-whole relationship in analogies?
A part-to-whole relationship in analogies involves recognizing how a smaller component relates to a larger entity, such as a wheel to a car or a leaf to a tree.
How do analogies help in problem-solving?
Analogies help in problem-solving by allowing individuals to apply known solutions or patterns from one context to a new or unfamiliar situation, facilitating creative and effective solutions.